In what has been described as the largest governance vote in crypto history, the Solana community has decisively rejected SIMD-0228. This proposal aims to introduce a dynamic emission schedule for staking rewards.
Despite an overwhelming lead in the early voting stages, the proposal failed to secure the required two-thirds supermajority, largely due to an unexpected surge in opposition from smaller validators.
The vote, which saw over 74% of network stakes participating across 910 validators, became a defining moment for Solana’s decentralized governance.
SIMD-0228 Proposal Failed
The proposal, co-authored by Tushar Jain, sought to transition Solana from a static staking rewards model to a market-driven one, potentially reducing staking rewards from 4.7% to as low as 1%.
The primary argument in favor was that lowering inflation would strengthen the SOL’s price and overall economic stability.
However, smaller validators saw it as a direct threat to their financial viability, fearing a significant reward loss would push them out of the network.
Despite SIMD-0228’s ultimate rejection, Jain and other proponents view the event as a major victory for Solana’s governance process.
The vote demonstrated the ecosystem’s decentralization, with validators of all sizes, institutional players, exchanges, and wallets actively participating.
Despite institutions being more involved in this proposal than in any prior governance debate, the vote proves that decentralization still exists within Solana.
Small Validators Lead a Stunning Reversal
At the start of the voting period, SIMD-0228 appeared set for a landslide victory. Early data indicated that ‘yes’ votes outnumbered opposition three to one.
However, as the deadline approached, a remarkable shift occurred. Smaller validators, concerned that reduced staking rewards would make it financially unsustainable for them to operate, mobilized in record numbers to counter the proposal.
On-chain data revealed a stark divide in voting patterns as validators with less than 500,000 SOL in network stake were twice as likely to vote against the proposal as those with larger holdings.
The last-minute vote surge from these smaller players tipped the balance, ultimately preventing SIMD-0228 from crossing the required 66.67% approval threshold.
For many in the community, this result was a triumph of decentralization. In a space often dominated by large stakeholders, the ability of smaller validators to collectively influence such a significant decision reinforced Solana’s democratic ethos.
Supporters of the opposition likened the outcome to a grassroots movement where the many outvoted the privileged few.
Despite the contentious nature of the debate, both sides acknowledged the importance of the process.
Even those who backed the proposal admitted that the process highlighted key areas for improvement in governance transparency and participation.
Vote Selling Sparks Controversy
While the governance battle played out, an unexpected twist emerged in the form of vote trading.
The Solayer validator introduced a novel approach by selling 10% of its vote tokens on Meteora, allowing stakeholders to purchase voting rights.
The proceeds from the sale were distributed back to Solayer’s staking pool, sparking debate about the implications of monetizing governance participation.
SolBlaze, a longstanding Solana validator, purchased these vote tokens and used them to vote against SIMD-0228.
Jason Li, co-founder of Solayer, defended the move as a social experiment to measure the economic value of governance votes.
“This may be the first instance in history where vote tokens were openly traded,” Li explained, arguing that such a mechanism could lead to deeper discussions about on-chain democracy and governance structure.
Critics, however, raised concerns about the potential for governance manipulation if vote trading became widespread.
Some argued that if validators could freely sell their votes, it could introduce a ‘pay-to-win’ dynamic that undermines the integrity of the governance process.
Others suggested that the visibility of voting decisions might need to be reconsidered to prevent undue influence from wealthier stakeholders.
All in all, the proposal has failed with majority opposition and therefore won’t be moving further.
The post Solana Community Rejects SIMD-0228 in Historic Vote as Small Validators Sway Outcome appeared first on Cryptonews.
News – Read More